Sunday, March 15, 2009

Big Ben Bernanke

My beard is more powerful than Chuck Norris'

Something unprecedented happened today on 60 Minutes. The chair Federal Reserves gave an interview. This has never happened before because of the influence that the chair has on the economy. May you live in interesting times.

As one of the most powerful man trying to get a grip on the current economic crisis, he decided to do this interview to humanize the effort to repair the economy. The interview talked about how upset he is that AIG has to be bailed out at the expense of the tax payers, focused on his middle class upbringing, and gave him an opportunity to speak to the American people.

It worked... for most part. I did not know that big Ben here is an academic and not a banker or businessman. I also appreciated the fact that big Ben had humble origins and can feel a bit more at ease that he may have the interests of the middle class close at heart.

Now, where he failed was the 3 things he wanted to say directly to the American people.

1. That the Fed is here working hard to fix the problem.

Ok, thanks, that's good to know. What else?

2. Recovery will be a slow process.

Been told that over and over again. But I think everyone knows that despite the desire for instant gratification.

3. We will recover.

Ok, got that too. Anything else? What about accountability? What about change? What are we going to do about the systemic problems that got us into this in the first place? Even when we recover it'll be pointless if things just go back to the way they were. You have a wonderful opportunity to create from the ashes something better. Please tell me you will be taking full advantage of that once the financial system stabilizes. You spoke of regulations but why do I feel that nothing systematic will change? We need outside the box thinkers here. Too long has the system rewarded the corrupt at the expense of everyone honest. We need that changed. Please change it.

4 should be, HEADS WILL ROLL.

That's what I want to hear. Thanks.

Not Enough Money for the Government?

Taxes are patriotic

I did my taxes this weekend. Although I hate paying taxes like everyone else, I recognize and appreciate its necessity. I value the things that my taxes that pay for that I take for granted every day: national defense, transportation infrastructure, research and development, etc. etc. At the same time, when people face tough choices between feeding their kids, paying the electric bill, or putting a roof over their heads, its hard not to take the public goods we have for granted. The government's put in a tough bind as well, facing declining revenue but increasing costs. They become reluctant to tax so they borrow like a kid with his first credit card.

I have a solution.

Tax religion. Tax the sh*t out of those thieving, leeching motherfu*kers and we'll be able to pay off our debts and probably have left overs for universal health care, our schools, and repair our crumbling infrastructure.

End solution.

Thank you.

Thick as Thieves, They Be

Sucka...

2? 3 bailouts, $170 of your money later, and AIG still intends on paying its execs bonuses? Are you fu*king kidding me? Their actions and "too big to fail" status forced our backs to the wall and they will want to pay out $165 millions in bonuses??!?! What other job do you get to rewarded for such monumental failure?

Be angry. I fu*king am.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Journalism 101

Class is in session m*therfu*kers. Professor Stewart presiding.

Kudos once again Mr. Stewart, kudos. The media are writing up this story as if they are looking at something they've never seen before. It's called journalism you tards. You know, not taking people at their words and holding them accountable? Try doing it sometime.

However, besides pointing out the lack of integrity in journalism done by the people that are supposed to be doing journalism, there was a more important point that was made. Class warfare exists and it is being waged by the rich on the poor every day. People look to game the system by risking what does not belong to them for short term game. They walk away with millions while, as Jon puts it so well, the house burns down. It is not right. The rot is deep. The problem is systemic. Consumer driven growth is an unsustainable vehicle for human progression. Why would we want to fix a system that generates nothing and games and gambles our future away by playing to greed and selfishness? First, Americans became the hardest working people in the world in order to fuel their consumption. When that wasn't enough, they went into debt to continue this irresponsible spending spree.

This is wrong. If we can't change the system, or if we can't change human tendencies then f*ck it. I'm all for over regulating these capitalist pigs to death.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Plea Bar... Whaaat???

Can you still smirk if I had my first in your mouth?

If you're black and you steal $50 from someone, you get 3 years.

So what happens if you're white and you steal $50 billion dollars from thousands of people? I'm guessing you get to go to some uppidy resort white collared prison for some time but am allowed to hide and preserve most of you assets that will be waiting for you when you get out.

For great injustice...

Give this Man His Peabody

Nay, give him the presidency, sir, I say!

Why is it that I learn more from watching fake news than I do from news? How is it that this man can do better journalism in a comedy show than professional journalists?

News exist to report on the immediate moment. They funnel their resources into making sure they are the first to get breaking news. As a result, fact checking and checks for consistency are put on the back burner.

Jon has created a niche in news for himself: a news program on news program. Watch as he tears CNBC apart, and this is just a single example of what he does night after night. Give this man a Peabody, please.

Truth of the Day

Sheila Bair, dropping knowledge on 60 Minutes

Wow, so we do have competent people dealing with the financial crisis. I don't have the exact quote here, but Ms. Chairman of the FDIC suggested that financial institutions should not be permitted to become "too big to fail", or rather, so big that they pose a system tic risk to the economy.

Wow.

Thank you.

Now speak up louder and make it happen.

Citibank stocks are under a dollar, but they keep getting bailed out. Where as closures are forced upon smaller community banks when they fail. Is this fair? No, it is not. Seems like the bigger you are, the more you can't lose. Market discipline does not apply to you. The execs still earn millions. Tax payers foot the bill for business to continue. Can we still call what we have free market capitalism?